Stewart et al v. EQ Industrial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jason Stewart and Patricia Creta
Defendant: EQ Industrial Services, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2010cv00177
Filed: April 30, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: W. Earl Britt
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion to Compel, granting in part and denying in part 78 Motion to Quash, granting in part and denying in part 83 Motion to Strike and denying 98 Motion to Compel. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 1/11/2012. (Marsh, K)
November 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER granting 27 Motion to Compel; granting 34 Motion to Compel; denying 44 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying as moot in part 46 Motion to Compel and granting in part and denying in part and denying as moot in part 48 Mot ion to Compel. Court will hold plaintiff's motion to compel 57 , defendant's motion to Quash 78 and plaintiff's motion to Strike 83 in abeyance until the parties have additional time to confer. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical information. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 11/30/2011. (Marsh, K)
November 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER granting 71 Motion for Leave to Appear and granting 73 Motion for Leave to Appear. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 11/18/2011. (Marsh, K)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER: The court ALLOWS the parties' motions to expedite (D.E. 50, 59, 62) on the terms specified herein. The court also ALLOWS defendants' motion for a discovery conference (D.E. 55) and shall hold a combined hearing on the remaining moti ons and discovery status conference on Tuesday, November 22, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in the Fifth Floor Courtroom of the Terry Sanford Federal Building and Courthouse, 310 New Bern Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina. Any outstanding responses to the remaining motions shall be filed by 12:00 p.m. on November 21, 2011. Signed by US Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 11/15/2011. (Sawyer, D.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart et al v. EQ Industrial Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Stewart
Represented By: LaDonna Mell Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Creta
Represented By: LaDonna Mell Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EQ Industrial Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?