Dalenko v. News and Observer Publishing Company et al
Plaintiff: |
Carol Dalenko |
Defendant: |
News and Observer Publishing Company, Orage Quarles, III and H. Hugh Stevens, Jr |
Case Number: |
5:2010cv00184 |
Filed: |
May 5, 2010 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Office: |
Western Division Office |
County: |
WAKE |
Presiding Judge: |
Malcolm J. Howard |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
May 17, 2011 |
Filing
82
ORDER denying 81 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 5/17/2011. Case manager telephoned Ms. Dalenko to advise of the ruling per her request and forwarded a certified copy of the order via first class mail to Ms. Dalenko. (Heath, D.)
|
January 10, 2011 |
Filing
64
ORDER denying 50 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 56 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 59 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 9 MOTION to Dismiss, 10 Memorandum in Support, 56 MOTION for Ext ension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 9 MOTION to Dismiss, 50 MOTION for Reconsideration re 49 Order on Motion to Stay,, ( Responses due by 1/12/2011); granting 59 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 59 MOTION for E xtension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 9 MOTION to Dismiss, 10 Memorandum in Support, 56 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 9 MOTION to Dismiss, 50 MOTION for Reconsideration re 49 Order on Motion to Stay,, ( Responses due by 1/12/2011) Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 1/10/2011. (Heath, D.)
|
December 14, 2010 |
Filing
49
ORDER denying 46 Motion to Stay. The court has carefully reviewed the record in this case and has determined that Judge Daniel's order denying entry of default against defendants is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The court, th erefore, OVERRULES plaintiff's objections and AFFIRMS Judge Daniel's October 26, 2010, order. Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this order to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss, filed June 8, 2010. Plaintiff's motion to stay pending appeal [DE #46] is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 12/14/2010. (Heath, D.)
|
May 17, 2010 |
Filing
8
ORDER denying 5 Motion for TRO. Certified copy forwarded to pro se plaintiff via First Class Mail. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 5/17/2010. (Heath, D.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?