UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Meads Subway, Inc. et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Meads Subway, Inc. and Tammy Yu Hsu Meads |
| 5:2010cv00264 |
| June 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAYNE |
| James C. Dever |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that entry of default has been entered against the named Defendants. In accordance with Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, counsel for the Plaintiff, United States of America, having requested ju dgment against the defaulted Defendants and having filed a proper affidavit, judgment is rendered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the above named Defendants, jointly and severally, in the sum of $27,797.39, including principal of $20, 102.49, interest of $660.88, administrative charges of $100.00, penalties of $201.85, and fees of $6,732.16, and costs allowed under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(2) of $350.00. Interest thereon after date of entry of this judgment shall be a the rate of.23%.Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk on 11/4/2010. (Sawyer, D.)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 7 Motion for Entry of Default as to Tammy Yu Hsu Meads. Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court on 10/19/2010. (Sawyer, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
