Worsley v. Perdue

Plaintiff: Eddie L Worsley
Defendant: Beverly Perdue
Case Number: 5:2010cv00285
Filed: July 20, 2010
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: Terrence W. Boyle
Nature of Suit: Economic Stabilization Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 8, 2010 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 3 Memorandum and Recommendations and terminating 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by U.S. District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 12/6/10. (Talbert, S.)
October 17, 2010 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eddie L. Worsley. Objections to M&R due by 11/3/2010. Signed by USMJ James E. Gates on 10/15/10. (Talbert, S.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Worsley v. Perdue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eddie L Worsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beverly Perdue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?