Huggins v. NC Dept of Administration et al
| Linda K Huggins |
| NC Dept of Administration and NC Human Relations Commission |
| 5:2010cv00414 |
| October 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered September 13, 2013, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted. The plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from this action. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 09/13/2013. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER denying without prejudice 107 Motion to Compel - The parties are ORDERED to confer no later than November 13, 2012 to resolve these disputes. If any further discovery disputes in this matter are referred to the undersigned, sanctions shall b e imposed pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any subsequent motion to compel shall specifically describe the results of the ordered discovery conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Webb on 10/25/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER granting 102 Motion for Leave to Designate an Expert - The court DIRECTS the parties to meet and confer, through counsel, and to submit to the court within 14 days of this order a proposed order suggesting amended deadlines for plaintiffs a nd defendants expert disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2), including reports for retained experts, and deadlines for completion of depositions of the expert witnesses. A new deadline for the submission of dispositive motio ns, presently set for December 1, 2012, may also be suggested. The court emphasizes that the present scheduling amendment shall not permit reopening of other discovery deadlines, presently set for completion by September 1, 2012 and fact depositions set for completion by October 1, 2012, but shall permit an extension solely for purposes of deadlines for expert disclosures and depositions as set forth above. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/17/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER denying as moot 89 Motion to Stay and granting 97 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order - Counsel should review the attached order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/20/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER denying 84 Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash - Plaintiff is ORDERED to make herself available for deposition, to be noticed and conducted in conformity with Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than June 22 , 2012. Where the court here extends the deadline for depositions, it finds cause also to extend the dispositive motions deadline. Accordingly, dispositive motions shall be filed no later than July 23, 2012. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/07/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER granting 80 Motion for Extension of Time to Depose Witnesses and to Serve Dispositive Motions - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/01/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion to Compel; granting 43 Motion to Amend Case Management Order; denying 48 Motion for Mscellaneous Relief; denying 56 Motion to Compel; and, adopting 70 Memorandum and Recommendations - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 02/22/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting in part and denying in part as moot 63 Motion to Postpone Trial Date Pending Immediate Appeal of 60 Order and denying 64 Motion to Postpone Trial Date Pending Immediate Appeal of 60 Order for Rule 54(b) Certification of Fin al Judgment, in the Alternative, Certified Request for Interlocutory Order to Timely Appeal - In order to promote efficiencies in case scheduling, the court waits for benefit of the magistrate judge's M&R on the parties' various pending dis covery motions. Upon this court's consideration of the M&R, with benefit of the parties' objections, if necessary, this court will enter further order as is appropriate to promote the efficient scheduling of this case, particularly the sett ing of a new trial date. The court cannot state that Rule 54(b) appeal is proper, and cannot state that there is "no just cause for delay" of appeal of the dismissed claims. The court denies plaintiff's motion for Rule 54(b) judgment. The court cannot certify that its order is appropriate for interlocutory appeal, and plaintiff's motion for certification is denied. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/08/2011. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER adopting 37 Memorandum and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss; and denying 16 Motion for Leave to File - Motions lodged at docket entries 38 , 43 , 48 and 56 are REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Daniel. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/01/2011. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 26 Motion Extension of Time to Select a Mediator and denying without prejudice to its renewal by plaintiff 29 Motion in Limine - Mediation is currently stayed. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 02/25/2011. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
