Boykin Anchor Company, Inc. v. AT&T Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Boykin Anchor Company, Inc.
Defendant: Larry Wong and AT&T Services, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2010cv00591
Filed: December 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 302 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 284 Motion for Bill of Costs - Defendants are awarded total costs in the amount of $5,455.12 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, Local Civil Rule 54.1, and 28 U.S.C. § 1920. These costs are taxed against the plaintiff and shall be included in the judgment. Costs in the amount of $10,591.20 are disallowed. Defendants' request for certain transcript costs of $18,696.98 is disallowed without prejudice. Within 14 days of this order, de fendants may resubmit their request for the cost of the original transcript of the depositions previously identified and provide adequate documentation. Failure to respond constitutes a waiver of those costs. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 09/26/2014. (Baker, C.)
January 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 298 ORDER denying 292 Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and fdenying as moot 295 Motion to Stay - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 01/13/2014. (Baker, C.)
October 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 288 JUDGMENT - Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 10/16/2013. (Baker, C.)
May 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 277 ORDER granting 255 Motion to Seal 254 PROPOSED SEALED Reply, 253 PROPOSED SEALED Reply - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/03/2013. (Baker, C.)
March 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 258 ORDER granting 156 Motion to Seal Document 155 PROPOSED SEALED Memorandum in Support - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/29/2013. (Baker, C.)
May 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER granting 135 Motion to Seal 133 Brief in Support of Appeal of Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration of Motion to Compel - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/22/2012. (Baker, C.)
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER granting 115 Motion to Seal - Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 03/29/2012. (Baker, C.)
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER denying 95 Motion for Reconsideration - Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 03/20/2012. (Baker, C.)
March 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER granting 102 Motion to Seal Docket Entry 101 - Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 03/12/2012. (Baker, C.)
February 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER granting 97 Motion to Seal 96 PROPOSED SEALED Memorandum in Support - Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 02/21/2012. (Baker, C.)
January 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER denying 78 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 1/4/12. (Tripp, S.)
November 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying 58 Amended Motion to Compel - Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 11/17/2011. (Baker, C.)
October 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER granting 71 Motion to Seal 70 PROPOSED SEALED DOCUMENT - Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 10/25/2011. (Baker, C.)
August 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 PROTECTIVE ORDER - Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/17/2011. (Baker, C.)
May 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss - Plaintiff's Lanham Act claim (Count II), gross negligence claim (Count III), and ordinary negligence claim (Count IV) are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's claims for unfair and decep tive trade practices (Count I) and libel (Count II), and plaintiff's requests for injunctive relief (Counts VI and VII), remain pending against defendants Larry Wong and AT&T Services, Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/19/2011. (Baker, C.)
April 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION memorializing ORAL ORDER granting 19 MOTION to Dismiss and granting 27 MOTION to Dismiss - Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 4/14/11. (Tripp, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boykin Anchor Company, Inc. v. AT&T Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boykin Anchor Company, Inc.
Represented By: Alex Ryan Williams
Represented By: R. Daniel Boyce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Wong
Represented By: Raymond M. Bennett
Represented By: Hayden J. Silver, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc.
Represented By: Raymond M. Bennett
Represented By: Hayden J. Silver, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?