Whitaker v. Nash County et al
Virginia Diepheal Whitaker |
Nash County, Nash County Department of Social Services, Melvia Batts and Josie Green |
5:2011cv00015 |
January 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
NASH |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered September 5, 2012, that the that the defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. Plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from the defendants. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 9/11/2012. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 31 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/5/2012. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting 18 Motion to Consolidate Cases - The court ORDERS that civil action No. 5:ll-cv-15-FL, currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, is consolidated with civil action No. 5:11-cv-55 -FL, currently pending in same, for all further proceedings. A master file is hereby established for this proceeding and shall be captioned Virginia Diepheal Whitaker v. Nash County. et aI., Consolidated Civil Action No. 5:11cv-15-FL. All future filings should be filed in this matter file, civil action No. 5:11-cv-15-FL. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/29/2011. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.