The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Bynum et al
Plaintiff: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant: Edward S. Bynum and Tony E. Bynum
Case Number: 5:2011cv00062
Filed: February 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: xxU.S. Outside District
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered December 31, 2012, that defendant Edward S. Bynums motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. Judgment is entered in favor of Edward S. Bynum and proceeds previously deposited shall be paid to this defendant as indicated in the court's September 21, 2011 order. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 01/02/2013. (Baker, C.)
December 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 8 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/31/2012. (Baker, C.)
February 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Stay and denying 8 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings - The court is mindful, however, that this litigation has been ongoing for some time with little participation from the parties. To promote the expeditious reso lution of this case, defendant Tony, who has requested a stay while he appeals his conviction, is ORDERED to provide status report with the court no later than May 16,2012, notifying the court ofthe progress ofhis appeal, including his case number an d the name and contact information of counsel, if applicable. Should defendant Tony fail to provide said status report, the court will appropriately enter show cause order as to why judgment should not be entered sua sponte against him. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 02/21/2012. (Baker, C.)
September 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 15 MOTION to Deposit, for Default Judgment against Tony E. Bynum and for Summary Judgment - Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/21/2011. (Baker, C.)
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting 11 Motion for Entry of Default against Tony E. Bynum - Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court on 07/15/2011. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Bynum et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward S. Bynum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tony E. Bynum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Represented By: Benjamin L. Worley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?