Ewing v. Silviuos et al
| Odell Ewing |
| Raleigh Police Department, J.A. Silvious and K. Kinney |
| 5:2011cv00064 |
| February 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| COLUMBUS |
| James C. Fox |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER - Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE-59] and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE-68] are DENIED without prejudice to renew. This case is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Webb to establish an expedited discov ery schedule. Additionally, Defendant's Motion to Take Deposition from Plaintiff [DE-62] and Defendant's Amended Motion to Compel [DE-65] are ALLOWED; Defendant's Motion to Compel [DE-63] and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Schedu ling Order [DE-70] are DISMISSED as moot; and Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement or Trial Hearing [DE-73] and Plaintiff's Second Motion for Settlement or Trial Hearing [DE-74] are DENIED. Signed by Senior US District Judge James C. Fox on 3/18/2014. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (McDowell, G.)
|
|
Filing
15
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the court DISMISSES plaintiffs action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and DENIES plaintiffs Motions to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court by Susan Edwards, Deputy on 11/17/2011. (Edwards, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
