Supler v. Absolute Collection Service, Incorporated
| Jonathan W. Supler |
| Absolute Collection Service, Incorporated and John and Jane Doe |
| 5:2011cv00229 |
| May 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs - Defendant is ORDERED to pay to plaintiff the sum of Sixteen Thousand Six Hundred and Four Dollars and 38/100 ($16,604.38) in attorney's fees, and t he sum of Eight Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars and 55/100 ($877.55) in costs. Plaintiff is further DIRECTED to show, within fourteen days (14) good cause for failure to timely serve the John and Jane Doe defendants, else these defendants will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/18/2013. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT in favor of Jonathan W. Supler against FKAACS, Incorporated - Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 07/09/2013. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding ORAL ORDER denying 23 Motion to Certify Class - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/06/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER regarding 34 Motion for Reconsideration - The court's decision on the initial motion entered October 9, 2012, recognized as Mr. Horn therein advised, that co-counsel, Peter R. Shedor, with office in or around Cary, would be attending th e hearing. Mr. Horn was relieved of necessity also to attend. Plaintiff raises the issue again in motion made today, reciting importance of Mr. Horn to resolution of the certification issue presented in tandem with request for approval. It appears n o travel plan timely was developed in furtherance of hearing set nearly four weeks ago, however. The court is prepared to go forward as noticed tomorrow with hearing at New Bern, where both sides will be represented. If plaintiff wishes to further Mr. Horn's attendance, he may move now for a continuance and the court will schedule hearing at a later date and time. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/10/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER dismissing as moot 32 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically - The motion recites that co-counsel Peter R. Shedor will be attending the hearing in person. There being no opposition, where plaintiff will be represented through other counsel, the court excuses Mr. Supler from attendance. As such, the court need not reach request for leave to appear by telephone, which request is dismissed as moot. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/09/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
