Coach, Inc. et al v. Associates of Raleigh Inc. et al
Coach Services, Inc. and Coach, Inc. |
Associates of Raleigh Inc. and Does 1 through 100 |
5:2011cv00316 |
June 17, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
WAKE |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER granting 59 Motion to Stay - In light of the Parties having reached settlement as to all matters in the case, all deadlines are hereby stayed pending the finalization of the necessary settlement documents between the Parties. The Parties shall file their Stipulation of Dismissal on or before September 14, 2012, or notify the Court if additional time is required in order to do so. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/21/2012. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 27 ORDER denying 26 Motion for Court-Hosted Settlement Conference - Where no special showing has been made as to why a private mediator cannot facilitate the parties' efforts to resolve the issues in dispute, without more, the parties' mo tion is denied. Where the parties were to provide by December 15, 2011, joint correspondence to the court indicating the identity of the individual selected to serve as their mediator and date for mediation, and this time has expired, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from date of entry of this order within which to comply with these provisions of the case management order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/16/2011. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.