Demos v. Krispy Kreme
John Robert Demos, Jr. |
Krispy Kreme |
5:2011cv00414 |
August 5, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
xxU.S. Outside District |
James C. Fox |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that because the Plaintiff does not contend that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to § 1915(g). Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court on 8/16/2011. Copy to plaintiff via regular mail. (Edwards, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Demos v. Krispy Kreme | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Krispy Kreme | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John Robert Demos, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.