Exclaim Marketing, LLC v. DIRECTV, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Exclaim Marketing, LLC
Defendant: DIRECTV, Inc. and DirecTV Operations, LLC
Case Number: 5:2011cv00684
Filed: December 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 282 ORDER granting in part 266 Motion for Bill of Costs - DIRECTV is awarded (1) $350.00 in fees of the clerk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920(1); (2) $11,870.15 in transcript costs pursuant to § 1920(2); and (3) $32,726.18 in c opy costs pursuant to§ 1920(4). Total costs in the amount of $44,946.33 are taxed against plaintiff and shall be included in the judgment. Within 14 days of this order, DIRECTV may supplement its request with adequate documentation for the costs of the original transcript of the depositions of Kristin Haley, Diane Lahti, Rick Stefanik, and Aaron Zydnonik. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 3/28/2016. (Baker, C.)
December 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 276 ORDER granting 264 Motion to Seal 262 PROPOSED SEALED MOTION and 263 PROPOSED SEALED Memorandum in Support - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/2/2015. (Baker, C.)
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 260 JUDGMENT - Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 09/30/2015. (Baker, C.)
March 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 256 ORDER granting 254 Motion to Seal 250 PROPOSED SEALED Reply - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/11/2015. (Baker, C.)
February 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 242 ORDER granting 230 Consent Motion to Seal Document - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/23/2015. (Tripp, S.)
December 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER granting 196 Joint Motion for Setting The Post-Trial Briefing Schedule - The parties shall file their post-trial motions and supporting memoranda on or before January 19, 2015. The parties shall file opposing briefs on or before February 9, 2015. Any reply briefs shall be filed on or before February 23, 2015. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/03/2014. (Baker, C.)
December 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 195 MEMORANDUM OPINION Following Oral Order Denying 106 MOTION in Limine TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF DIANE LAHTI - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/02/2014. (Baker, C.)
November 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 164 ORDER granting 160 Motion to Seal Exhibit 11 regarding 128 PROPOSED SEALED Declaration - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/12/2014. (Baker, C.)
September 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER granting 117 Consent Motion to Seal 113 PROPOSED SEALED Response - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/26/2014. (Baker, C.)
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER granting 73 Motion to Seal Document - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/01/2013. (Baker, C.)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER granting 76 Motion to Seal Exhibits 1 and 2 regarding 58 First MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses and Production of Documents - Because only the exhibits to the motion to compel are to be filed under seal, plaintiff is directed to refile the motion to compel, and separately file the exhibits 1 and 2 as proposed sealed exhibits. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/13/2013. (Baker, C.)
November 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER and STIPULATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/13/2012. (Baker, C.)
July 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART as to the tortious interference with contract and tortious interference with prospective advantage claims and DENIED IN PART as to the defamation and unfair and deceptive trade practices claims. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/23/2012. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Exclaim Marketing, LLC v. DIRECTV, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DIRECTV, Inc.
Represented By: Adam J. Bedel
Represented By: Garrick Alcarez Sevilla
Represented By: Brian C. Vick
Represented By: Michael E. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DirecTV Operations, LLC
Represented By: Adam J. Bedel
Represented By: Garrick Alcarez Sevilla
Represented By: Brian C. Vick
Represented By: Michael E. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Exclaim Marketing, LLC
Represented By: Joseph H. Nanney, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?