Huggins v. Walmart Store #3595, et al
| Denise Lynn Huggins |
| Nicky Lennon and Walmart Store #3595 |
| 5:2011cv00713 |
| December 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| CUMBERLAND |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated wit hin forty-five (45) days hereof. Further, the court suspends requirement for any further response to defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.s motion to dismiss filed August 27, 2012 [DE # 44] until after this court has addressed any such motion to reope n the case, after which a new briefing schedule will be ordered. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before Tuesday, October 9, 2012. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/12/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 40 Motion to Stay Discovery - All discovery is STAYED in this case pending the Court's ruling on Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, which is set to be filed on Augu st 27, 2012. Pending the Court's ruling on Walmart's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, if there are any remaining claims to be decided, then the Parties shall, within twenty-one (21) days following this Court's dis position of Walmart's Motion to Dismiss, confer regarding a Rule 26(f) discovery plan, and, within fifteen (15) days after the 26(f) conference, file a proposed discovery plan and exchange mandatory initial disclosures. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/27/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Amend Complaint and granting in part and denying as moot in part 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted as to defendant Lennon, a nd plaintiff's claims against defendant Lennon are dismissed in their entirety. Plaintiff shall have twenty-one (21) days from date of entry of this order within which to file an amended complaint. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/01/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Stay - All discovery is STAYED in this case pending the Court's ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The deadlines and requirements set forth in Federal Rules 16 and 26, Local Rule 26.1, and the Court' ;s Initial Order Regarding Planning and Scheduling are SUSPENDED pending the Court's ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Following this Court's disposition of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, the parties shall, within twenty o ne (21) days thereafter, confer regarding a Rule 26(f) discovery plan and file a proposed discovery plan and exchange mandatory initial disclosures both within fifteen (15) days after the 26(f) conference. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/20/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
