Vick v. Vandenberg, Chase & Associates, et al
Tamieka Vick |
Vandenberg, Chase & Associates, Chris Norman and Mohammad Ahmed |
5:2011cv00734 |
December 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
WAKE |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated wit hin sixty (60) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before Monday, July 8, 2013. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/09/2013. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 43 ORDER dismissing as moot 39 Motion for Order to Show Cause and to Extend Deadline to Select Mediator and granting 42 Motion to Modify Case Management Order - Counsel should review the attached order in its entirety for altered case schedule. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/12/2013. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 25 ORDER terminating 13 Motion for Entry of Default and granting 23 Motion to Withdraw 13 Motion for Entry of Default - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/11/2012. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.