Payne, et al v. McDonald's Corporation, et al
| National Alliance for Accessibility, Inc. and Denise Payne |
| McDonald's Corporation and Ireland Crossing, Inc. |
| 5:2012cv00007 |
| January 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| CUMBERLAND |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated wit hin forty-five (45) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before Monday, August 27, 2012. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/12/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Stay - The Rule 26(f) Conference required by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's May 29, 2012 Initial Order Regarding Planning and Scheduling, is STAYED until fourteen (14) days after the Court rules on Defendants' currently pending Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/12/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
