DeArrys v. North Carolina Rate Bureau
Ladrea Krystal Eve DeArrys |
North Carolina Rate Bureau |
5:2012cv00140 |
March 16, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
WAKE |
Terrence W. Boyle |
Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 MOTION to SEAL and Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 5/29/2012. Parties should read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information - copy mailed to the plaintiffs address listed on the docket. (Ruffin, L.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DeArrys v. North Carolina Rate Bureau | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: North Carolina Rate Bureau | |
Represented By: | C. Matthew Keen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ladrea Krystal Eve DeArrys | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.