ERGS II, L.L.C. v. Lichtin, et al
| ERGS II, L.L.C. |
| Harold S. Lichtin and Harold S. Lichtin Family Limited Partnership |
| 5:2012cv00431 |
| July 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| BEAUFORT |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER granting in part and holding in abeyance in part 22 Motion for Summary Judgment - The court DIRECTS the parties to submit a joint accounting and confirmation of the total amount of indebtedness owed to plaintiff under the guaranty agreements , by August 20, 2013, with hearing to follow August 21, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. at New Bern, North Carolina. Counsel should read order in its entirety for critical information and directives. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/13/2013. (Tripp, S.)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 31 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Motion to Strike and granting 48 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and File Response regarding 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Counterclaims asserted by defendants are DISMISSED, and defendants' first affirmative defense is STRICKEN. Defendants' motion for extension of time is GRANTED, and defendants shall have up to and including May 10, 2013, to complete the limited discovery set fort h in defendants' motion. Plaintiff may clarify the dollar amount of the award sought in judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before April 4, 2013. Defendants' consolidated response to the motion for summary judgment, as supplemented, shall be due June 7, 2013, and reply, if any, by plaintiff, shall be due June 21, 2013. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/27/2013. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
51
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING THE DISCOVERY OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 02/28/2013. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction - Defendants shall have fourteen (14) days from date of entry of this order within which to respond to complaint. Initial order on scheduling matters separately will follow, which among other thin gs will set deadline for filing of the parties' joint report and plan. The court also takes note of the pendency of plaintiff's motion just filed and renders it unnecessary for defendants now to respond. With benefit of the parties' j oint report and plan, the court thereafter will enter its case management order, which will include deadline for defendants to respond to motion filed by plaintiff under Rule 56. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/26/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
