Krausz Industries Ltd. v. Smith-Blair, Inc., et al

Plaintiff: Krausz Industries Ltd.
Defendant: Smith-Blair, Inc., Sensus USA, Inc. and Sensus Manufacturing Shanghai Ltd.
Case Number: 5:2012cv00570
Filed: August 20, 2012
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Office: Western Division Office
County: xxOutside U.S.
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 15, 2016 184 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 163 Motion to Seal - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/15/2016. (Tripp, S.)
May 9, 2016 154 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 110 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and granting 125 Motion to Seal 121 PROPOSED SEALED Document - The clerk is DIRECTED to maintain under seal docket entry 121, where that document includes plaintiff's Exhibit D, which must remain under seal. (See DE 121 at 1-9). Plaintiff is DIRECTED to re-file that portion of docket entry 121 no longer under seal (Exhibit I), within 14 days of the date of this order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/9/2016. (Baker, C.)
April 19, 2016 153 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 123 Motion to Strike Defendants' Invalidity Contentions and to Limit Prior Art References and Combinations - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/19/2016. (Baker, C.)
August 31, 2015 106 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/31/2015. (Baker, C.)
December 15, 2014 91 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 71 Motion to Strike Portions of Defendants' Opening Claim Construction Brief and granting 74 Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Brief and to Supplement the Record - Plaintiff is directed to file its proposed reply, and defendants are directed to file their proposed surreply, along with any supplemental record materials not yet filed, within 7 days of the date of this order. The parties shall jointly propose to the court, within 14 days of the date of this order, 3 dates for claim construction hearing to take place on or after February 11, 2014. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/152014. (Baker, C.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Krausz Industries Ltd. v. Smith-Blair, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Krausz Industries Ltd.
Represented By: W. Thad Adams, III
Represented By: Lance A. Lawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith-Blair, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sensus USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sensus Manufacturing Shanghai Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?