Frazier v. Baxter et al
Plaintiff: Keith Edward Frazier
Defendant: Jeffrey Baxter, Charles Farrer, Jesse Dickinson, Jerry Seighman, Isaac Barrett, City of Washington and City of Greenville
Case Number: 5:2013cv00138
Filed: February 25, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: NEWHANOVER
Presiding Judge: W. Earl Britt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 105 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, in accordance with the court's order entered 9/15/2014, the Washington defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings in GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Greenville defendan ts' motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The City of Washington, the City of Greenville, Jeffrey Baxter, Charles Farrar, Jesse Dickinson, and Isaac Barrett are DISMISSED from this action. IT US FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that in accordance with the court's order entered 2/19/2016, Seighman's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and this case is closed. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 2/19/2016. Judgment to plaintiff via US Mail at Lee - USP, P.O. Box 305, Jonesville, VA 24263. (Marsh, K)
December 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER denying as moot 96 Motion for D.E. 85-87 and Digital Disk Attachment be Mailed to Plaintiff at Current Location to Allow Timely Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 12/30/2015. Copy of order mailed to plaintiff via US Mail at Lee - USP, P.O. Box 305, Jonesville, VA 24263. (Marsh, K)
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER denying 73 Motion for settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 3/24/2015. Order mailed to plaintiff via US Mail at Big Sandy - U.S.P., P.O. Box 2068, Inez, KY 41224. (Marsh, K)
March 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER denying as moot 47 Motion to Continue, denying as moot 48 Motion to Stay, denying as moot 51 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, denying as moot 57 Motion for copies and extension of any deadlines, denying a s premature 65 Motion for for issuance of subpoenas and denying as premature 66 Motion Request for Trial Date. Parties should read order in its entirety for critical information and deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 3/10/2015. Copy mailed to plaintiff via US Mail at Big Sandy - U.S.P., P.O. Box 2068, Inez, KY 41224. (Marsh, K)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment, granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion for judgment on the pleadings and granting 21 Motion for judgment on the pleadings. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 9/15/2014. Copy mailed to plaintiff via US Mail at address on record. (Marsh, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frazier v. Baxter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Edward Frazier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Baxter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Farrer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jesse Dickinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Seighman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Isaac Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Greenville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?