Patch Rubber Company v. Toelke
| Patch Rubber Company |
| Kirk Toelke |
| REMA TIP TOP / North America, Inc. |
| 5:2013cv00379 |
| May 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| NASH |
| Terrence W. Boyle |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER DENYING 38 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief Pending Appeal. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/1/2013. Counsel directed to read Order in its entirety. (Fisher, M.)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. As the TRO in this matter has already expired, defendant's motion to dissolve the TRO is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court will consider defendant's motion to dismiss once it has been fully briefed and is ripe for ruling. Plaintiff's 25 Motion to Seal Document is GRANTED. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 6/14/2013. (Edwards, S.)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Extend Temporary Restraining Order; granting 11 Motion to Set Hearing and/or Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Incorporated Memorandum and granting 12 Consent MOTION to Intervene (Emergency). Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/30/2013. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines. (Downing, L.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
