Weems v. Chavonne, et al
Lamont Weems |
Anthony G. Chavonne, Harold Medlock and Comb |
5:2013cv00712 |
October 10, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
xxU.S. Outside District |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 JUDGMENT - Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 03/04/2014. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING 11 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION - Plaintiffs claim against defendant Comb in his individual capacity premised upon alleged use of excessive force shall be allowed to proceed. Further, plaintiff's claim for wrongful arrest again st defendant Comb in his individual capacity is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff's remaining claims against defendant Comb in his official cap acity and against defendants Chavonne and Medlock in their individual and official capacities are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. With respect to continued management of this case, the court notes that plaintiff has not filed any summons for issuance by the clerk, as provided under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(b). Accordingly, plaintiff is DIRECTED to present a summons to the clerk with respect to remaining defendant Comb within 21 days of the date of this order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/12/2013. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.