Hatley, et al v. Bowden, et al
Plaintiff: Amy Hatley and Anika Hatley
Defendant: City of Raleigh, Bowden and City of Raleigh Police Department
Case Number: 5:2013cv00765
Filed: November 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered May 9, 2014, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that this matter is remanded to the Superior Court of Wake County, North Carolina. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 05/9/2014. (Baker, C.)
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER denying as moot 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting in part as to all causes of action asserted against it save plaintiffs' claim for negligence and denying as moot in remaining part 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; and granting in part as to plaintiffs' claim for negligence only but denying in remaining part 15 Motion to Amend Complaint - Plaintiffs are DIRECTED to file their amen ded complaint in accordance with this order granting in part and denying in part their motion to amend within fourteen (14) days of entry of this order. Finally, where the claims against defendant Bowden in her official capacity only are duplicative of the claims against defendant Raleigh, these claims against defendant Bowden in her official capacity are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/04/2014. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hatley, et al v. Bowden, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Raleigh
Represented By: Dorothy K. Leapley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bowden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Raleigh Police Department
Represented By: Dorothy K. Leapley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Hatley
Represented By: Joshua Gabriel Talton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anika Hatley
Represented By: Joshua Gabriel Talton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?