Campbell et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
Karen Campbell and Jerry Campbell, Sr. |
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Personal Credit Management, Kathleen B. King and Jack O. Clayton |
5:2013cv00785 |
April 7, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
WAKE |
James C. Dever |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss [D.E. 26] and DISMISSES plaintiffs' first amended complaint without prejudice. The court DENIES defendants' motion to strike plaintiff s' second amended complaint [D.E. 28], but GRANTS defendants' motion to treat plaintiffs' second amended complaint as a motion for leave to file the second amended complaint [D.E. 28], and DENIES as futile leave to file the second amended complaint. Signed by Susan Edwards, Deputy for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 10/22/2014. Copy sent to the plaintiffs via US mail to 8836 Campfire Trail, Raleigh, NC 27615. (Edwards, S.) |
Filing 44 ORDER denying 32 Motion for access to PACER to obtain copies as needed from the Court and access to PACER free of charge. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/13/2014. Sent a certified copy to the plaintiff via US mail. (Edwards, S.) |
Filing 42 ORDER granting 6 Motion to Seal Document 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/12/2014. (Tripp, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.