Parrish v. United States of America
| Katie Parrish |
| United States of America |
| 5:2013cv00794 |
| November 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| JOHNSTON |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated wit hin forty-five (45) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice on or before April 14, 2016. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/29/2016. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction - Plaintiff may pursue her claim inasmuch as she alleges a negligent failure to inspect the premises and warn of potential dangers. The parties are DIRECTED to confer and file with the court within 21 days of this order a proposed case schedule for proceeding to trial. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/5/2016. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Summary Judgment - The court construes this as a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Defendant's alternative motion for summary judgment also is GRAN TED in PART and DENIED in PART. Plaintiff may pursue her negligence claim to the extent it is grounded in defendant's failure to inspect the leased premises and initiate repairs, as well as defendant's failure to warn patrons of hazards on the leased premises. The parties are DIRECTED to confer and file with the court within 21 days of this order a proposed case schedule for proceeding to trial. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/27/2015. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Parrish v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Katie Parrish | |
| Represented By: | Gordon C. Woodruff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
