K-Flex USA, LLC v. Rack & More, LLC et al
K-Flex USA, LLC |
Rack & More, LLC, Antoine Utley, TransXpress, LLC, 1975 LLC, Baxter Bailey & Associates, Inc., Landstar Ligon, Inc., Alexander Miller & Associates and Advanced Transport, LLC |
5:2013cv00795 |
November 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
FRANKLIN |
Terrence W. Boyle |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the motions for an order resolving claims to funds [DE 29] and for default judgment [DE 30] are GRANTED. Judgment by default is entered against defendants Advanced Transport LLC, 1975, LLC d/b/a/ E dward Wolff & Associates, Baxter Bailey & Associates, Inc., and Alexander Miller & Associates. The Clerk shall pay out the funds as awarded pursuant to the courts order entered on April 1, 2015 at [DE 31] and to close the case. Signed by Susan Edwards, Deputy for Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 4/1/2015. Copy sent to Antoine Utley at 3900 North Hydes Ferry Road, Nashville, TN 37218, via US Mail. (Edwards, S.) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING 12 Nucor's Motion to Intervene. Nucor is substituted into this action for Defendant Rack and More, LLC, and Nucor has five days from the entry of this order in which to file its Answer and Claim to the Interpleaded Funds. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 6/11/2014. (Fisher, M.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.