McNeill v. Colvin
| Ryan Odell McNeill |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| 5:2014cv00028 |
| January 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| HARNETT |
| Terrence W. Boyle |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING 29 Consent Motion to Remand. The Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four and remands this case for further proceedings. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/7/2014. (Fisher, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McNeill v. Colvin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
| Represented By: | Dennis R. Foley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ryan Odell McNeill | |
| Represented By: | R. David Wicker, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
