Henderson v. McKenzie, et al
| Glenn Henderson |
| James Rosen, Adela Carrasco, Rosen & Saba, LLP, Kathleen McColgan, Kim Russo, Schmid & Voiles, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. and David McKenzie |
| 5:2014cv00029 |
| January 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| CUMBERLAND |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER dismissing 26 Motion for Reconsideration - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/29/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
25
AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Rosen & Saba, LLP, Schmid & Voiles, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Adela Carrasco, David McKenzie, James Rosen, Kathleen McColgan, Kim Russo - Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 10/02/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
23
JUDGMENT in favor of Rosen & Saba, LLP, Schmid & Voiles, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Adela Carrasco, David McKenzie, James Rosen, Kathleen McColgan, and Kim Russo - Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 09/30/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting 11 Motion to Dismiss - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/23/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time and Motion to Deem Out of Time Motions and Supporting Memoranda as Timely Filed; denying 18 Motion for Entry of Default; and dismissing as moot 18 Motion for Default Judgment - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/04/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
