Domtar AI Inc. et al v. J. D. Irving, Ltd. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 22, 2014
ORDER DENYING 52 Defendants' First Motion for Sanctions, and DENYING 57 Defendants' Second Motion for Sanctions. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 12/17/2014. (Fisher, M.)
|September 29, 2014
ORDER GRANTING 64 Joint Motion for Extension of Time, and DENYING AS MOOT 65 Joint Motion to Stay. Defendants have until October 20, 2014, to file their reply brief related to 52 Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiffs have until October 27, 2014, t o file their opposition to the 57 Second Motion for Sanctions. To clear up any confusion, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly for the reasons given in the August 20, 2014 order at 55 . Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 9/27/2014. (Fisher, M.)
|August 20, 2014
ORDER GRANTING 40 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, DENYING AS MOOT 45 Plaintiffs' Motion for Discovery, and DENYING 50 Plaintiffs' Motion to Seal Document. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/18/2014. (Fisher, M.)
|May 6, 2014
ORDER DENYING 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and HOLDING IN ABEYANCE 16 Defendants' Motion to Stay. The Defendants' Motion to Stay will be held in abeyance until motions practice before this Court has concluded. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/6/2014. (Fisher, M.)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?