Domtar AI Inc. et al v. J. D. Irving, Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Associated Hygienic Products LLC and Domtar AI Inc.
Defendant: J. D. Irving, Ltd. and James DeFelice
Case Number: 5:2014cv00058
Filed: January 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: Terrence W. Boyle
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER DENYING 52 Defendants' First Motion for Sanctions, and DENYING 57 Defendants' Second Motion for Sanctions. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 12/17/2014. (Fisher, M.)
September 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER GRANTING 64 Joint Motion for Extension of Time, and DENYING AS MOOT 65 Joint Motion to Stay. Defendants have until October 20, 2014, to file their reply brief related to 52 Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiffs have until October 27, 2014, t o file their opposition to the 57 Second Motion for Sanctions. To clear up any confusion, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly for the reasons given in the August 20, 2014 order at 55 . Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 9/27/2014. (Fisher, M.)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER GRANTING 40 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, DENYING AS MOOT 45 Plaintiffs' Motion for Discovery, and DENYING 50 Plaintiffs' Motion to Seal Document. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/18/2014. (Fisher, M.)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER DENYING 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and HOLDING IN ABEYANCE 16 Defendants' Motion to Stay. The Defendants' Motion to Stay will be held in abeyance until motions practice before this Court has concluded. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/6/2014. (Fisher, M.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Domtar AI Inc. et al v. J. D. Irving, Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. D. Irving, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James DeFelice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Associated Hygienic Products LLC
Represented By: Richard Scott McAtee
Represented By: Matthew David Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Domtar AI Inc.
Represented By: Richard Scott McAtee
Represented By: Matthew David Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?