NOA, LLC, et al v. El Khoury, et al
Plaintiff: NOA, LLC and Insaf Nehme
Defendant: Walid El Khoury, Edward El Khoury and Hope Comercio E Industria Limitada
Case Number: 5:2014cv00114
Filed: February 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 284 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that for the reasons stated in the court's order entered September 5, 2017, that defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and plai ntiff's fifth claim for relief for breach of contract is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that for the reasons stated in the court's order entered August 15, 2018, all remaining claims asserted by plaintiff are dismis sed for failure to prosecute, and plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from defendants on plaintiff's claims against defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that for the reasons stated in the court's order entered Septe mber 23, 2021, defendants' motion for default judgment is denied and defendants' counterclaims against plaintiff are dismissed due to plaintiff's discharge in bankruptcy. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/23/2021. (Collins, S.)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 269 ORDER denying 266 Motion of Plaintiffs to Withdraw the Reference of Adversary Proceeding to the Bankruptcy Court. The clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of the instant order for filing in adversary proceeding Walid El Khoury, Edward El Khoury, and Hope Comercio E. Industria Limitada v. Insaf George Nehme, No. 5:19-AP-00033-SWH (Bankr. E.D.N.C.). Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/26/2019. (Collins, S.)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 247 ORDER granting 246 MOTION for Clarification and denying as moot Motion for Telephonic Status Conference. The court re-notices hearing to commence at New Bern on September 13, 2018, now to begin that day at 9:30 am. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/27/2018. (Collins, S.)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 244 ORDER - Defendants' motions to dismiss and for entry of default, 223 , are GRANTED, and plaintiff's motion to set aside default, 228 , is DENIED. In accordance with this order, hearing is noticed at New Bern for that session beginning September 13, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/15/2018. (Collins, S.)
November 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 230 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/17/2017. (Collins, S.)
June 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER granting 196 Motion to Seal - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/12/2017. (Tripp, S.)
August 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER regarding 121 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution and 125 MOTION to Toll Deadlines and for Alternative Sanctions - The court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants' motion for sanctions. (DE 121; DE 125). The court GRANTS the motion insofar is it requests sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b). The court DENIES the motion insofar as it requests involuntary dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 (b). Within 14 days of the date h ereof, defendants shall file on the docket a lists of all expenses claimed under Rule 37(b)(2)(C). Within 7 days of the date on which defendants serve that document, plaintiffs shall file a response in opposition, if any. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/23/2016. (Baker, C.)
July 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 142 AMENDED STIPULATION AND DISCOVERY CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/29/2016. (Baker, C.)
November 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 106 STIPULATION AND DISCOVERY CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/10/2015. (Baker, C.)
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER denying 26 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/31/2015. (Baker, C.)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER denying 25 Motion to Strike 24 Response in Opposition to Motion; granting 30 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to 26 MOTION to Dismiss; denying 12 Motion for Entry of Default as to Defendant Walid El Khoury; a nd granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer - Defendant Walid El Khoury is accorded until July 7, 2014, within which to make his response. As such, his motion to dismiss filed that date is deemed timely. Plaintiffs shall have a full twenty-one (21) days from this date within which to respond to 26 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/29/2014. (Baker, C.)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Service via Hand Delivery in Angola - Plaintiffs are authorized to effect service on Defendants Edward El Khoury and Hope Comercio E Industria Limitada by hand delivery in Angola and that the time within which Hope Comercio E Industria Limitada may be served is hereby extended by an additional one hundred and twenty (120) days to and including October 29, 2014. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 06/30/2014. (Baker, C.)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 7 Motion for Appointment of Special Process Server Regarding Service in Angola and Lebanon - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/31/2014. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NOA, LLC, et al v. El Khoury, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NOA, LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Connolly Stone
Represented By: Camden R. Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Insaf Nehme
Represented By: Elizabeth Connolly Stone
Represented By: Camden R. Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walid El Khoury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward El Khoury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hope Comercio E Industria Limitada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?