Fogg v. Colvin
Mary Wilkins Fogg |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
5:2014cv00145 |
March 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
FRANKLIN |
Terrence W. Boyle |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and DENYING 21 Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and this case is remanded for an award of benefits. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 2/2/2015. (Fisher, M.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fogg v. Colvin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mary Wilkins Fogg | |
Represented By: | R. David Wicker, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
Represented By: | Thomas M. Nanni |
Represented By: | Craig B. Ormson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.