Mitchell v. Board of Trustees of Wayne Community College et al
Paul A. Mitchell |
Board of Trustees of Wayne Community College, Kay Albertson and Sonja Redmon |
5:2014cv00231 |
May 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
WAYNE |
James C. Dever |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER DENYING: 73 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 6/3/2015. A certified copy of this Order was sent on 6/3/2015 via US Mail to pro se plaintiff Paul A. Mitchell, 508 E. Mulberry Street, Goldsboro, NC 27530. (O'Brien, C.) |
Filing 55 ORDER dismissing as moot 38 Motion to Strike - Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 11/10/2014. (Tripp, S.) |
Filing 50 ORDER denying 26 Motion for Defendants to Show Cause as to Why a Default Judgment Should Not Be Issued; denying 28 PETITION for Judicial Review and Consolidation in Mitchell v. WCC et al; granting 42 Motion to Dismiss; granting 42 Motion to Dismiss for improper venue and on grounds of Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim under Title VI and VII and N.C.Gen Stat. 96-15, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, subject matter; denying 8 Motion for an Expedited Rule 16 Scheduling Conference and Order; and denying 19 Motion for Default Judgment - Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 11/3/2014. (Tripp, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.