Tran v. Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical
Plaintiff: Dinh Q. Tran
Defendant: Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical
Case Number: 5:2014cv00254
Filed: April 30, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: HARNETT
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 70 JUDGMENT - Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 5/18/2016. (Baker, C.)
April 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion for Summary Judgment - Defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claims under Title VII, NCEEPA, the ADA, and REDA is GRANTED. However, defendant's motion for summary judgment on the issue of plaintiff's liability under defendant's counterclaim based upon the parties' settlement agreement is DENIED. Because a counterclaim generally continues despite summary judgment on plaintiff's claims, the court DIRECTS defendant to show cause why the counterclaim should not be denied as a matter of law in light of the discussion herein, within 14 days of entry of this order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 4/18/2016. (Baker, C.)
December 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER granting 61 Motion to Seal Document 60 PROPOSED SEALED Document - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/17/2015. (Baker, C.)
April 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying 38 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings - Where defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, the court LIFTS the STAY of discovery. Further order on scheduling will follow, also with regard to the parties' joint report and plan. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/27/2015. (Baker, C.)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying 12 Motion for Default Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Defendant's motion is read by the court under the circumstances presented as one sounding as a motion to quash service of process colorably made upon it. That motion will be allowed. However, the case will remain on the docket pending effective service. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days to accomplish service of process on the defendant. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/22/2014. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tran v. Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dinh Q. Tran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical
Represented By: Michael C. Lord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?