Carpenter v. Seagroves et al
| Tramilla Carpenter |
| David Seagroves, Officer Snyder and City of Wilson Police Department |
| 5:2014cv00352 |
| June 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WILSON |
| James C. Fox |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 6/13/2016. Copy mailed to Tramilla Carpenter, 1000 Briggs St., Wilson, NC 27893 via US Mail on 6/13/2016. (Grady, B.)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 32 Seagroves's Motion to Dismiss and granting 34 City of Wilson's Motion to Dismiss. The City of Wilson is DISMISSED as a party to this action. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to continue management of this case. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 10/13/2015. Copy sent to Tramilla Carpenter, 1000 Briggs St., Wilson, NC 27893 via US Mail on 10/13/2015. (Grady, B.)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The parties are reminded to read the order in its entirety for detailed information. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 2/2/2015. Certified copy sent via US Mail to Tramilla Carpenter at 1000 Briggs St., Wilson, NC 27893. (Edwards, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
