VELASQUEZ MONTERROSA v. MI Casita Restaurante Mexicano et al
| MOISES ENOT VELASQUEZ MONTERROSA |
| Mi Casita Restaurants, Juan M. Macias, Jesus Macias, JFC, LLC, JM MACIAS, INC., MACIAS ENTERPRISE, LLC, MACIAS LLC, MC MANAGEMENT, LLC, MEXICAN FOODS EXPRESS, INC., PIRAMIDE MEXICAN FOODS, INC. and VIA 216 NC, LLC |
| 5:2014cv00448 |
| August 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| CUMBERLAND |
| Terrence W. Boyle |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 76 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief and denying Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 9/29/2016. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for important deadlines and information. (Stouch, L.)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 67 Motion for Extension of Time to Hold Mediation and Provide the Parties Phase II Discovery Plan. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/11/2016. The parties are reminded to read the attached order in its entirety. (Downing, L.)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting 49 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 4/26/2016. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical information. (Romine, L.)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 31 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 5/1/2015. (Marsh, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
