Aristilde et al v. Todd Glover Farms, Inc. et al
||Kethlie Aristilde, Aviles Derilus and Mirtha Derilus
||Todd Glover Farms, Inc., John Doe and Pedro Martinez
||October 2, 2014
||US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
||Western Division Office
||xxU.S. Outside District
||James C. Dever
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 12, 2018
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Aviles Derilus, Kethlie Aristilde against John Doe, Pedro Martinez. Plaintiff Kethlie Aristilde SHALL recover from defendants John Doe and Pedro Martinez, jointly and severally, the sum of $225,000. Plaintiff Kethli e Aristilde also shall recover pre-judgment interest at the legal rate. Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the legal rate until this judgment is paid in full by either or both defendants. Plaintiff Aviles Derilus SHALL recover from defendants Joh n Doe and Pedro Martinez, jointly and severally, the sum of $200,000. Plaintiff Aviles Derilus also shall recover pre-judgment interest at the legal rate. Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the legal rate until this judgment is paid in full by either or both defendants. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 2/12/2018. (Briggeman, N.)
|July 14, 2016
ORDER granting 53 Motion for Entry of Default against John Doe. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 7/13/2016. (Briggeman, N.)
|May 10, 2016
ORDER granting 41 Motion for Entry of Default against Pedro Martinez. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 5/10/2016. (Briggeman, N.)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?