Comerica Bank v. D'Beefs, LLC et al
Comerica Bank |
D'Beefs, LLC, 7 by 34, LLC, Erica R. Licardo and Maurice Grunwitz Licardo |
5:2015cv00038 |
January 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
CUMBERLAND |
James C. Fox |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Maurice Grunwitz Licardo be dismissed as a party to this action; this action be stayed as to Defendant Erica R. Licardo; Comerica have and recover of Defendants D'Beefs and 7 by 34, j ointly and severally, the amount of $276,403.79, plus interest thereon from and after 1/15/2015, at the contractual per diem rate of $37.04 until paid; Comerica recover its attorney's fees from D'Beefs and 7 by 34, jointly and se verally, in the amount of $41,460.57; and Comerica recover the costs of this action. Comerica's Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment and Attorney's Fees [DE-18] is ALLOWED. Signed by Deputy Clerk Jacqueline B. Grady on behalf of Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court, on 12/3/2015. (Grady, B.) |
Filing 20 ORDER denying without prejudice 18 Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment and Attorney Fees. The automatic stay is LIFTED as to Defendant Maurice Licardo. Comerica is DIRECTED to file supplemental briefing within 30 days of the filing date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 10/21/2015. Counsel is directed to read the order in its entirety for detailed information. (Grady, B.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.