Western Plastics, Inc. v. DuBose Strapping, Inc.
Western Plastics, Inc. |
DuBose Strapping, Inc. |
5:2015cv00294 |
July 2, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
WAKE |
James C. Dever |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 272 ORDER denying 229 Motion for a declaration that this case is exceptional and for an award of attorneys' fees. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever, III on 9/24/2020. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 213 ORDER granting 201 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 11/21/2019. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 146 ORDER granting 141 Motion for Reconsideration. The parties shall conferand propose trial dates in July, September, and October 2019. The submission is due no later than March 15, 2019. The submission should include an estimate of the number of trial days needed. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 2/28/2019. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 140 ORDER - The court GRANTS DuBose's motion to strike [D.E. 117], DENIES DuBose's motion in limine to exclude Schulte [D.E. 57], GRANTS Western Plastics's motion to strike the '714 Patent [D.E. 131], DENIES DuBose's motion for p artial summary judgment [D.E. 49], and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Western Plastics's motion for partial summary judgment [D.E. 97]. In addition, the court GRANTS the parties' first stipulation [D.E. 66] and second stipulation [D.E. 1 26]. DuBose's motion in limine [D.E. 55] and Western Plastics's motion in limine [D.E. 61, 65] are deemed WITHDRAWN. Western Plastics's motion for extension of time is DENIED as moot [D.E. 63]. Western Plastics's motion in limine [D.E. 60] is incorporated in its motion for partial summary judgment, and the motion in limine is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 9/25/2018. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 95 ORDER granting 59 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 77 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 91 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 10/2/2017. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 93 ORDER granting 92 Motion to Stay and setting status conference. A status conference will be held on 10/2/17 at 3:00 pm. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 9/25/2017. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 35 ORDER granting 34 Motion to Schedule a Telephonic Status Conference. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 5/9/2017. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 27 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 7/25/2016. (Briggeman, N.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Western Plastics, Inc. v. DuBose Strapping, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Western Plastics, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Lynne A. Borchers |
Represented By: | Anthony Paul DeRosa |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DuBose Strapping, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Anthony J. Biller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.