Stewart Engineering, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company et al
Plaintiff: Stewart Engineering, Inc.
Defendant: Continental Casualty Company, Zurich American Insurance Company and Skanska USA Building, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2015cv00377
Filed: July 31, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: WAKE
Presiding Judge: James C. Fox
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 75 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court GRANTS defendant's motion for summary judgment [D.E. 54], and DENIES plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [D.E. 61]. Defendant may file a motion for costs in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court's local rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that on 11/16/2016, the court granted Clark Nexsen's Motion to Dismiss or Drop Party [DE 45]. Clark Nexsen, Inc. is DISMISSED WIT HOUT PREDJUDICE from this action pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In addition, on 1/31/2017, the court granted Zurich American Insurance Company's Motion for Misjoinder [DE 48]. Zurich is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREDJUDICE from this action pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/20/2018. (Briggeman, N.)
January 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 48 Motion for Misjoinder. Zurich is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREDJUDICE from this action pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 1/31/2017. (Grady, B.)
November 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting 45 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Clark Nexsen is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREDJUDICE from this action pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 11/16/2016. (Grady, B.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart Engineering, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Continental Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zurich American Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Skanska USA Building, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stewart Engineering, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen P. Safran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?