AVX Corporation v. Corning Glass Works, et al
| AVX Corporation |
| Corning Glass Works, Corning Incorporated, Components, Incorporated, Corning International Corporation, Corning France, S.A. and Corning Limited |
| 5:2015cv00543 |
| October 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| BEAUFORT |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
320
Order - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlemen t not be consummated within 45 days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice on or before July 27, 2020. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/12/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
314
ORDER denying 277 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; denying 277 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/18/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
275
ORDER granting 200 Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant AVX Corporation's Twelfth and Thirteenth Claims for Relief; granting in part and denying in part 203 Motion for Summary Judgment < i>As to Its CERCLA, Negligent Misrepresentation, and Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practice Claims; granting 212 Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I, II, III, IV, V, XI, XII, and XIII; granting 215 Motion to Strike Expert Tes timony and Evidence, MOTION for Sanctions and Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony and Evidence; denying 215 Motion for Sanctions; granting in part and denying in part 217 Motion to Strike Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Expert Tes timony and Strike the Expert Reports of Thomas D.W. Hutto; granting 221 Motion to Exclude Certain Expert Testimony of Dr. R. Paul Philp; denying 224 Corrected MOTION to Exclude Certain Expert Testimony of Dr. Richard Royer; finding as moot 241 Motion to Strike Declaration of Christopher Bonessi [Dkt. No. 223-19]; denying 246 Motion to Strike 245 Declaration, 240 Declaration, 244 Declaration, 243 Declaration; denying 246 Motion to Compel; denying 246 Motion for Sanctions; finding as moot 258 Motion to Strike (1) Portions of AVX's Third Supplemental Statement of Undisputed Facts and Appendix Thereto; and (2) The March 26, 2019 Declaration of Christopher Bonessi; granting in part and denyi ng in part 178 Motion for Summary Judgment As To Corning's Counterclaims. The following claims remain for adjudication at trial as between plaintiff and defendant Corning: 1) CERCLA claims and counterclaims (as limited on certain issue s by summary judgment ruling herein); 2) declaratory judgment claims and counterclaims; and 3) breach of contract claims and counterclaims. Accordingly, this case now is ripe for entry of an order governing deadlines and procedures for final pretria l conference and trial. The parties are DIRECTED to confer and file within 21 days from the date of this order a joint status report. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/26/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion to Dismiss; denying 127 Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike The Corning Defendants' Counterclaims. The parties are DIRECTED to file, within 14 days of this order, a joint motion for scheduling order, by consent or by setting out each parties position separately, proposing categories of additional discovery, if any, and proposing a final deadline for discovery and dispositive motions. Thereupon the court will enter such further order regarding case scheduling as is warranted. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/28/2018. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
159
ORDER denying 117 Motion to Stay THE CORNING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 4/25/2018. (Tripp, S.)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER granting 145 Joint Motion for Discovery To Designate Additional Expert and to Extend Certain Discovery Deadlines - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/27/2018. (Tripp, S.)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER granting 139 Motion to Seal Document [138-1] [138-3] Declaration. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/9/2018. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
112
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/27/2017. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER granting 110 Motion For Leave to Conduct Depositions after Discovery Disputes Resolved but before 1/26/18. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/25/2017. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 58 Motion for Sanctions and to Compel. In the courts discretion, plaintiffs motion to compel is denied. The total sum of $7,984.21 is due to be paid by defendants to plaintiff within 14 days hereof. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 4/28/2017. (Edwards, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
