Pitts v. Hedges et al
Case Number: 5:2016cv00127
Filed: January 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 251 ORDER granting 250 Motion for 10% surcharge. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 6/1/2023. Copy sent via US Mail to Jeffrey G. Hedges at 12 Cool Springs Drive, Asheville, NC 28806 . (Stouch, L.)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 207 ORDER granting 204 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/29/2022. Copy sent via US Mail to Jeffrey Hedges and Medical Fusion at 12 Cool Springs Drive Asheville, NC 28806 and ADIO Management Company, Inc. at 170 S. Willow Brook Drive, Asheville, NC 28806. (Stouch, L.)
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER denying 91 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 94 Motion for Protective Order, 96 Motion for Protective Order, 101 Motion for Protective Order, and 103 Motion Requesting oral argument on various motions. Signed by Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 1/24/2020. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. (Stouch, L.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pitts v. Hedges et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?