Oates, et al v. North Carolina Department of State Treasurer, et al
Plaintiff: Priscilla Everette Oates and Duarthur Oates
Defendant: North Carolina Department of State Treasurer, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations, Lolita Chapman, Beth Wood, Vance Holloman, Robin Hammond, Sharon Edmundson, Gregory McLeod, Gwendolyn Knight, Ann Howell, North Carolina Local Government Commission, North Carolina State Auditor and Does 1-100
Case Number: 5:2016cv00623
Filed: June 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Western Division Office
County: xxU.S. Outside District
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 218 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's order entered January 14, 2020, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/14/2020. (Collins, S.)
October 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 166 ORDER denying 159 Motion for Discovery FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' ASSERTION THAT PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY RYAN STUMP HAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS AN ATTORNEY IN THIS ACTION BECAUSE HE MAY BE A WITNESS. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 10/30/2018. (Collins, S.)
October 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER - Defendant Longs motion to dismiss 134 is GRANTED, and plaintiffs claim against defendant Long is DISMISSED as time barred. The remaining motions 130 , 132 , 136 , are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set fort h herein. In particular, the court STRIKES: 1) references to All defendants in the headings for the first and second causes of action, and 2) references to the Doe defendants and to non-party LGC as a Defendant in the first amended complaint. The cle rk is DIRECTED to STRIKE DOES 1-100 and NORTH CAROLINA STATE AUDITOR from the case caption. In all other respects the remaining motions are DENIED as set forth herein. In addition, stay regarding scheduling activities imposed November 7, 2016, is LIF TED, and the parties are DIRECTED to file within 14 days of the date of this order an updated joint report and plan, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and the courts July 1, 2016, initial order regarding planning and scheduling. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/31/2017. (Collins, S.) M
May 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 101 Amended Motion for Clarification of the Court's Preference for an Amended Complaint in Lieu of Filing a New Action and Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Motion fo r First Amended Complaint and denying as moot 104 Motion to Dismiss - Plaintiff is allowed to proceed on the claims set forth in the attached order. Plaintiff's remaining claims for malicious prosecution (count one) and denial of equal prote ction (counts five and six), as well as all claims against defendants McLeod, Knight, and Howell, are DISMISSED as futile for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file within 14 days of the date of this order an amended complaint settin g forth only those claims and defendants remaining in accordance with the instant order. Plaintiff must serve her first amended complaint on Chapman, Wood, Holloman, Hammond, Edmundson, and Long, and these defendants must respond within 14 days after service of the first amended complaint. In addition, defendant Wood's motion to dismiss (DE 104) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/23/2017. (Baker, C.)
July 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER granting 90 Motion to Stay Further Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motions to Dismiss - The Initial Order Regarding Planning and Scheduling and all further proceedings in this matter are stayed pending the Court's final ruling on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/19/2016. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oates, et al v. North Carolina Department of State Treasurer, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Priscilla Everette Oates
Represented By: Adam Cabral Bonner
Represented By: Charles Adams Bonner
Represented By: Samuel John Randall, IV
Represented By: Ryan David Stump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duarthur Oates
Represented By: Adam Cabral Bonner
Represented By: Charles Adams Bonner
Represented By: Samuel John Randall, IV
Represented By: Ryan David Stump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Carolina Department of State Treasurer
Represented By: Scott T. Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lolita Chapman
Represented By: Hal F. Askins
Represented By: Jennifer Joy Strickland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beth Wood
Represented By: Daniel Snipes Johnson
Represented By: Jeremy David Lindsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vance Holloman
Represented By: Scott T. Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robin Hammond
Represented By: Scott T. Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Edmundson
Represented By: Scott T. Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory McLeod
Represented By: Hal F. Askins
Represented By: Jennifer Joy Strickland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gwendolyn Knight
Represented By: Katie Weaver Hartzog
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ann Howell
Represented By: Katie Weaver Hartzog
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Carolina Local Government Commission
Represented By: Scott T. Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Carolina State Auditor
Represented By: Daniel Snipes Johnson
Represented By: Jeremy David Lindsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?