Oates, et al v. North Carolina Department of State Treasurer, et al
Priscilla Everette Oates and Duarthur Oates |
North Carolina Department of State Treasurer, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations, Lolita Chapman, Beth Wood, Vance Holloman, Robin Hammond, Sharon Edmundson, Gregory McLeod, Gwendolyn Knight, Ann Howell, North Carolina Local Government Commission, North Carolina State Auditor and Does 1-100 |
5:2016cv00623 |
June 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
xxU.S. Outside District |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 218 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's order entered January 14, 2020, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/14/2020. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 166 ORDER denying 159 Motion for Discovery FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS' ASSERTION THAT PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY RYAN STUMP HAS CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS AN ATTORNEY IN THIS ACTION BECAUSE HE MAY BE A WITNESS. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 10/30/2018. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 146 ORDER - Defendant Longs motion to dismiss 134 is GRANTED, and plaintiffs claim against defendant Long is DISMISSED as time barred. The remaining motions 130 , 132 , 136 , are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set fort h herein. In particular, the court STRIKES: 1) references to All defendants in the headings for the first and second causes of action, and 2) references to the Doe defendants and to non-party LGC as a Defendant in the first amended complaint. The cle rk is DIRECTED to STRIKE DOES 1-100 and NORTH CAROLINA STATE AUDITOR from the case caption. In all other respects the remaining motions are DENIED as set forth herein. In addition, stay regarding scheduling activities imposed November 7, 2016, is LIF TED, and the parties are DIRECTED to file within 14 days of the date of this order an updated joint report and plan, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and the courts July 1, 2016, initial order regarding planning and scheduling. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/31/2017. (Collins, S.) M |
Filing 121 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 101 Amended Motion for Clarification of the Court's Preference for an Amended Complaint in Lieu of Filing a New Action and Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Motion fo r First Amended Complaint and denying as moot 104 Motion to Dismiss - Plaintiff is allowed to proceed on the claims set forth in the attached order. Plaintiff's remaining claims for malicious prosecution (count one) and denial of equal prote ction (counts five and six), as well as all claims against defendants McLeod, Knight, and Howell, are DISMISSED as futile for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file within 14 days of the date of this order an amended complaint settin g forth only those claims and defendants remaining in accordance with the instant order. Plaintiff must serve her first amended complaint on Chapman, Wood, Holloman, Hammond, Edmundson, and Long, and these defendants must respond within 14 days after service of the first amended complaint. In addition, defendant Wood's motion to dismiss (DE 104) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/23/2017. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 92 ORDER granting 90 Motion to Stay Further Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motions to Dismiss - The Initial Order Regarding Planning and Scheduling and all further proceedings in this matter are stayed pending the Court's final ruling on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/19/2016. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.