Rogers v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
| Andrew Stutfield Rogers |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Keffer, Inc., Suntrust Bank, Elite Skippers, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union, LLC |
| 5:2016cv00671 |
| July 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER granting 73 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Discovery deadline 7/17/17. Motions deadline 9/14/17. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for additional critical deadlines and information. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 6/29/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting 64 Motion for Modification of Deadlines in Scheduling Order. Counsel should read order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 4/11/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Chase's motion to dismiss is DENIED as to the UDTPA claim in count one arising from im proper collection letters, and is otherwise GRANTED. Keffer's motion to dismiss is DENIED as to the UDTPA claim in count one arising from Streng's request that Rogers lie to the police, and is otherwise GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 3/17/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
