Phillips v. Smithfield Packing Company, Inc.
| Aisha Phillips |
| Smithfield Packing Company, Inc. |
| 5:2016cv00834 |
| October 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WILSON |
| James C. Dever |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER denying as moot and withdrawn 48 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 67 Motion to Withdraw. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 10/4/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER denying as moot 40 Motion to Sever. Signed by United States Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 7/10/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 38 Motion to excuse Plaintiff Germaine Perry from attending the settlement conference in person. If Perry wishes to dismiss her claim or seeks to have her claim severed, she may file a separate motion seeking that relief from the district court. Signed by United States Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 6/7/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Stay. The proceedings shall be stayed until July 10, 2017, pending a court-hosted settlement conference. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Numbers for a court-hosted settlement conference. Judge Numbers will contact the parties concerning the schedule for the settlementconference. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 5/10/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
