Massenburg v. Hunt et al
| Nancy Massenburg |
| Ashley Hunt and Unnamed Client Discriminatory Hiring Policy |
| 5:2016cv00957 |
| December 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| James C. Dever |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1322 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court GRANTS ITS's motion for summary judgment [D.E. 112] and DENIES Massenburg's motion to stay summary judgment [D.E. 132]. The court DENIES Massenburg's motion for leave to fi le a second amended complaint [D.E. 97] and her motion for leave to file a sur-reply [D.E. 151 ]. The court GRANTS ITS's motion to strike in part Massenburg's second amended complaint [D.E. 134], GRANTS Lee Air's motion to dismiss [D.E . 154], and DENIES Massenburg's motion to amend the court'sscheduling order [D.E. 110]. The court also DISMISSES as moot defendants's motion for a protective order [D.E. 105] and Massenburg's motion to compel [D.E. 117], currently pending before Magistrate Judge Gates. The court STRIKES Massenburg's latest filing [D.E. 171] and DISMISSES as moot defendants' motion to strike [D.E. 173]. Defendants may file a motion for costs in accordance with the Federal Rules of Ci vil Procedure and this court's local rules.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on 8/2/2017 the court GRANTED defendants Hunt and Korando's motion to dismiss Massenburg's amended complaint [D.E. 40] and DISMISSED Massenburg's claims against Hunt and Korando with prejudice. Hunt and Korando are no longer defendants in this action. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/4/2019. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER granting 84 Motion to Strike; granting 86 Motion for Joinder construed as a motion for leave to amend; denying 90 Motion to Compel. The court orders Massenburg to file an amended complaint within 15 days from the date of entry of this order naming both ITS and Lee Air Conditioners as defendants and outlining her claims against them, the supporting factual allegations, and the damages she seeks. This order does not authorize Massenburg to add any additional claims against ITS. Massenburg shall also submit a summons for Lee Air Conditioners with her amended complaint. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 5/15/2018. Sent to Nancy Massenburg at PO Box 61512 Durham, NC 27715 via US Mail. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying without prejudice 51 Motion for Discovery; denying without prejudice 61 Motion for Joinder pending the court's issuance of a scheduling order. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/22/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER: the court GRANTS defendants Hunt and Korando's motion to dismiss Massenburg's amended complaint [D.E. 40] and DISMISSES Massenburg's claims against Hunt and Korando with prejudice. Hunt and Korando are no longer defendants in this action. Hunt and Korando's original motion to dismiss [D.E. 27] has been WITHDRAWN. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/2/2017. Filed copy mailed to pro se plaintiff. (Jenkins, C.)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 57 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 6/28/2017. Sent to Nancy Massenburg at PO Box 61512 Durham, NC 27715 via United States Mail. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER Staying 10 Motion for Discovery; granting 12 Motion for Leave to File; Staying 13 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 5/3/2017. Sent to Nancy Massenburg at PO Box 61512 Durham, NC 27715 via United States Mail. (Briggeman, N.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
