Smith et al v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
| Fredrick E. Smith and Beth Smith |
| Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 5:2017cv00056 |
| January 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| CUMBERLAND |
| W. Earl Britt |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER regarding 58 Stipulation; denying as moot 53 Motion for Attorney Fees, Costs, and Interests. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 7/26/2019. (Herrmann, L.)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 43 Motion for Attorney Fees without prejudice. If appropriate, plaintiffs may renew their motion within 14 days after the Court of Appeals issues its mandate. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 12/26/2018. (Edwards, S.)
|
|
Filing
42
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied and plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is granted. Defendant shall back pay plaintiffs' benefits, reinstating benefits as of the denial date, 16 June 2016, (including life insurance premium waivers). Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/2/2018. (Herrmann, L.)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying as moot 5 Motion to Dismiss and denying 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs' demand for a jury trial is STRIKEN. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 5/3/2017. (Marsh, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
