Lusterman v. Berryhill

Lusterman v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Angelika Renee Lusterman
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	5:2017cv00138
Filed:	March 22, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office:	Western Division Office
County:	CUMBERLAND
Presiding Judge:	James C. Dever
Nature of Suit:	Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 402
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 24, 2018	Filing 24 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of $4,902.00 in attorney fees and $400.00 in filing fees, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising u nder EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. Such payment should be sent to: Maria Concetta Mayo, Ricci Law Firm, P.A. P.O. Box 483 Greenville, North Carolina 27835. Provided that the aw ard to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff's counsel, Ricci Law Firm, P.A., and mailed to the office address above in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment to counsel of her right to payment of attorney fees under EAJA. If the award is subject to Offset, the remaining fees, if any, will bepayable to Plaintiff and sent to Plaintiff's counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/24/2018. (Briggeman, N.)
September 29, 2017	Filing 20 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205( g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of the Commissioner's unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner'sdecision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and remands the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings with respect to Plaintiffs claim of disability. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/29/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 24, 2018

Filing 24 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of $4,902.00 in attorney fees and $400.00 in filing fees, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising u nder EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. Such payment should be sent to: Maria Concetta Mayo, Ricci Law Firm, P.A. P.O. Box 483 Greenville, North Carolina 27835. Provided that the aw ard to Plaintiff is not subject to the Treasury Offset Program, payment will be made by check payable to Plaintiff's counsel, Ricci Law Firm, P.A., and mailed to the office address above in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment to counsel of her right to payment of attorney fees under EAJA. If the award is subject to Offset, the remaining fees, if any, will bepayable to Plaintiff and sent to Plaintiff's counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/24/2018. (Briggeman, N.)

September 29, 2017

Filing 20 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205( g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of the Commissioner's unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner'sdecision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and remands the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings with respect to Plaintiffs claim of disability. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/29/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lusterman v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angelika Renee Lusterman
Represented By:	Maria Concetta Mayo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?