Redox Tech, LLC V. Earthworks Solutions, LLC, et al.
| Redox Tech, LLC |
| Earthworks Solutions, LLC and Edward Escochea |
| 5:2017cv00447 |
| September 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| xxU.S. Outside District |
| Kimberly A. Swank |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER - Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 71 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty claim (second claim for relief) is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Redox and Haselow's Motion to Dismiss 96 is DENIED.Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 4/10/2018. (Foell, S.)
|
|
Filing
113
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding 89 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 2/26/2018. (Foell, S.)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER denying without prejudice defendant's 63 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and STRIKING it's answer and counterclaim 65 . Defendants may refile their motion, answer and counterclaim, if appropriate, after the stay in this action has been lifted. On or before December 6, 2017, the parties shall file a joint report informing the court of the status of their settlement and the parties' claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 11/29/2017. (Foell, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
