Monroe v. Forjas Taurus S.A., et al.
Stacey Monroe |
Taurus Holdings, Inc., Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc. and Forjas Taurus, S.A. |
5:2017cv00604 |
December 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
CUMBERLAND |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER granting 58 Motion to Seal Document 57 PROPOSED SEALED Document. The parties' Joint Consent Motion to File Document Under Seal is GRANTED and the proposed Settlement Agreement and Release shall be placed in t he Court record under seal. The Court further ORDERS that any Orders and transcripts in connection with this Court's ruling on the parties' motion for Court-approval of the settlement agreement be sealed as well. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/24/2019. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting 35 Motion compelling the Cumberland County District Attorney's Office to comply with subpoena. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/15/2018. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 27 ORDER finding as moot 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; finding as moot 16 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 16 Motion for More Definite Statement. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/14/2018. (Collins, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.