Devarapally et al v. Ferncreek Cardiology, P.A. et al
| 5:2017cv00616 |
| December 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 52 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; finding as moot 66 Motion for Protective Order; finding as moot 67 Motion for Protective Order. Where the parties superseded their first set of consent motions for protective orders by subsequent motions, the consent motions filed January 10, 2023 (DE 66-67) are TERMINATED AS MOOT. The second set of motions for protective orders (DE 68-69) will be addressed by separate order. An initial order regarding planning and scheduling will follow so that the parties can submit a new Rule 26(f) report for entry of a case management order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/2/2023. (Collins, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Devarapally et al v. Ferncreek Cardiology, P.A. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
